Baltric > Chad LeCroy ？ a day ago

　　tudents storming the legislative yuan and executive yuan is not dysfunctional enough？ parliament members physically blocking the speaker stand for 36 sessions is not enough？ Inherent dislike between 本省 and 外省 or those who can speak Taiwanese and those who can't， even though all are naturally born in Taiwan？

　　学生们强行非法攻占立法院和行政院很正常吗？国会议员用身体挡住了扬声器强行阻止别人发言很正常吗？区分本省人和外省人就看你会不会说一种本来就不属于当地的方言，还美其名曰“台语”，这很正常吗？

　　Chad LeCroy > Baltric ？ a day ago

　　People standing up and fighting for their freedom is not dysfunctional。 Again your comments make no sense and are truly offensive。 What is dysfunctional is the way you think。 I don't know if are just trying to be funny or you really think this way。 It doesn't make a whole lot of sense， sorry。

　　人们站起来为自己争取自由怎么会不正常呢。还有，你的评论不但充满了攻击性，还没有什么实际意义。你是不是看什么都觉得不正常，我不知道你是为了搞笑还是真的这样想。很抱歉在你的回复里没看到什么具体意义。

　　Baltric > Chad LeCroy ？ 16 hours ago

　　People standing up for their rights is fine， as long as they follow the rules and procedures。 I。e。 constitutional challenge in court。

　　If you find what I write offensive， please explain？ If you've never witnessed what I described， you should expose yourself to less homogeneous crowds since they are still going on in Taiwan。

　　人们站起来为自己争取自由当然是正常的，只要他们遵守规则和程序，别挑战宪法的权威。

　　你说我的评论充满了攻击性，请问哪里充满了攻击性？如果你从来没有见过我说的这些现象，你应该到台湾街头多走走，因为我说的这些现象都是台湾的特点。

　　Hantine Kirkland > Baltric ？ a day ago

　　I don't know who you are or where you're from， but it's really disrespectful to make a general comment like that about the relationship between 本省 and 外省 or between people that do or don't speak taiwanese。 You apparently don't know what Taiwan is like now。 And how can you say Taiwan as a whole is dysfunctional just because the students are storming the legislative yuan and executive yuan。 If that's the criteria for being dysfunctional then the whole world has been dysfunctional in the past century。

　　我不知道你是谁，来自哪里，但你评论的有关本省人外省人说不说台语这件事情真的很无礼。很显然你并不知道台湾现在发生了什么，你怎么能说台湾社会不正常呢，只是因为学生们都在占领立法院和行政院吗？如果以这样的标准来说就是社会不正常，那么整个世界在过去的一个世纪里都不正常了。

　　Baltric > Hantine Kirkland ？ 16 hours ago

　　How's it disrespectful if it's true？ I'm merely pointing out a flaw in the Taiwanese society。

　　Are you saying this problem no longer exists？ Just like how there's no more racism in the United States？

　　You are absolutely correct， the world can be pretty dysfunctional， depending on which view you subscribe to。 For example， gay rights， legalizing marijuana。。。。etc。 I'm sure there are many more。 However， I'm not saying that I'm against any of the aforementioned issues， but that different sectors of society have different expectations and values。

　　什么叫很无礼？我只不过是指出了台湾社会的缺陷罢了。

　　你意思是说这些问题都不存在了？就像说美国已经没有种族歧视了一样。

　　你说的很对，这个世界都很不正常。这取决于你看待问题的视角，比如同性恋问题，大麻的合法化问题等等，我并不是说我反对我说的这些存在的问题，但不同的社会阶层有不同的期望和价值观。

　　hence。liu > Hantine Kirkland ？ a day ago

　　If we always focus on groups than we can't solve problem， our constitution still have flaw。

　　如果我们总是去关注我们不能解决问题，那我们的宪法就是有缺陷的。

　　kart_125cc > Peter Lim ？ a day ago

　　"She can take back Taiwan anytime she want"

　　Meaning what exactly？ By force？ Perhaps。 Having an ability to do a thing is not the same as being willing to take on the costs and consequences attendant with pursuit of such an action。 The US has the ability to simply nuke anyone who would deign to disagree with her - in case they forgot。 Obviously the cost of doing so would be far greater than anything gained。 For that matter， if China should "take back" Taiwan， well， the US could just nuke China - in case they forgot。 Just saying。 Obviously the cost to the US of lobbing nukes to "solve" any disputes would be far greater than anything gained。 Similarly， the cost to China of "taking back" Taiwan would be greater than anything gained。

　　The problem is that "taking back" Taiwan would surely be a Pyrrhic victory。 I'm sure China knows that。 Taiwan knows that。

　　Fortunately for the world， most geopolitical disputes are addressed in terms of cost/benefit analysis rather than simple "ability" to do this or that。